17 September 2010

2012 Republican Presidential Nominees: Who's Your Top Five?

The GOP's emerging 2012 frontrunners... take our poll


Included in my list below are the Intrade odds for each: the ultimate devil's advocate, as these are people who make a living guessing this stuff- and in a business not kind to fools. The Intrade number represents what a share costs for a chance at a $100 payout... so it's roughly the assigned % chance for the candidate winning the Republican nomination in 2012 according to their oddsmakers.

My new debate partner Aurelius at Pundit Press also has his five below, then tell us what you think... final results published next week. Here's my picks as of now, fwiw:


+ Natural political talent, huge charisma, tough, principled conservative, a real fighter, building a lot of support with her winning touch in the primaries

Too good-looking by half, slightly silly accent, establishment GOP/MSM/entire Left out to destroy the poor gal... and Levi Johnston needs to get a job on a rig in Siberia

Intrade: 18.6

Sum: Hard to hold this one down... just like the powerful grassroots movement she's so closely allied with
_________________________________________________


+ Highly competent manager, economic expert, previous runner-up, looks and acts presidential

Too good-looking by half, dull on the stump, hiding/laying low while waiting his turn, mostly absent from today's battle for the future of the nation... disappointing, where's some courage and sense of urgency here?  The tipping-point is now, not two years too late...

Intrade: 31.2

Sum: apparent front-runner to this point, and the establishment's dream candidate. For the rest of us, the father of RomneyCare has got some 'splainin to do... and we haven't heard a peep yet.
_________________________________________________


+ social conservative, respected governor, no apparent skeletons

Lacks charisma and national political base, has been tepid in support of TEA Party movement... 'Cuda left him in the dust

Intrade: 12.8

Sum: already running, basically
_________________________________________________


+ Wiz-kid Reaganite with a resume/record of success that puts most others to shame, impressive manager in most ways, novel background

still not 40 yrs old, pretty-much choked in his big national TV debut

Intrade: 4.6

Sum: I really like Bobby Jindal... for 2016-2020, though.
_________________________________________________

John Bolton

+ Great strategic mind, true conservative -and patriot- all the way

Pugnacious nature, honest to a fault, lack of campaign experience, distaste for for inside-the-Beltway DC political games

Intrade: n/a

Sum: Love the man... but I dunno if he's serious about recent hints, and came as quite a surprise to most.
_________________________________________________

Runners-up: Barbour, Daniels, or maybe Newt- although he's a non-starter for me personally due to heavy, heavy baggage and a number of poor choices from working with race-hustler Al Sharpton to total loser moves in NY-23... Scozzafava really made fool of him. 

As a defense hawk, I don't stand take Ron Paul serious... at all. 

Sure like Petraeus, would like to hear more from him on some key issues. But the good General seems fairly resolute about not entering politics anyway, and if the politically inexperienced Petraeus did go that way, perhaps a better fit as a VP alongside -say- a Sarah Palin...

_________________________________________________


Sarah Palin- Yes, the bane of the Dmocratic Party and liberals in general is one of the top contenders for the Presidency come 2012. With clear political pull (just look at her endorsements for congress) and her presence in the American media, Mrs. Palin has both clout and name recognition. Add to that the fact that she could be the first female Commander-in-Chief and you've got someone who is poised to strike at the presidency.

David Petraeus- One of the greatest and most repsected military minds of our age, David Petraeus is one of my favorite candidates. Not only does he have cadence and quick wit, but he has incredible foreign policy experience. On top of that is his honorable and exceedingly successful military leadership. Petraeus deserves respect and has earned it.

Jeb Bush- That's right, another Bush. Jeb Bush successfully led Florida as its governor for two terms and has the conservative values that Republicans are looking for. With discontent with President Obama rising, by 2012 many voters will have a much brighter view of the George W. Bush years than during the 2008 election. Jeb Bush's last name could very well boost his candidacy.

Chris Christie- Although he's been in office for just a short time, Chris Christie's governorship of New Jersey has been nothing short of excellent. Though some doubts about this conservative-ness abound, his actions so far leading NJ show a conservative who is also pragmatic and good at what he does. On top of it all, he has shown he knows how to run a campaign and win.

Mitt Romney- The most important thing going for Mitt Romney is name recognition. Coming just short of the Republican nomination for President in 2008, Romney has been in the public's ey for over two years now. Some questions still about about his stances, but he is widely considered conservative.

Dark HorseGlenn Beck: One of the nation's most influential political commentators, he has spearheaded a gigantic rally in Washington as well as the Tea Party and 9.12 Project. He'll have no problem with name recognition and is extremely conservative to boot. Though he's said that he won't run, some of his actions say otherwise.


Please choose five: 

survey tools


Thanks to all for participating...

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Can't support any of these because I am not convinced that they are Constitutional Conservatives. I could care less if they are Reagan Republicans, we've had too many "Republicans" and not near enough Conservatives and we've had very few of those that follow the Constitution to the letter. My vote? None of the above.

Andy in Georgia

Reaganite Republican said...

Who qualifies then, Andy- anybody?

Amusing Bunni said...

Fun Poll, RR! Let's get Blago on there....hee hee.
It's still kind of early to call it, but I'd say mine are Sarah, Marco R. Jim DeM. Chris C. & Mitt.

Reaganite Republican said...

Blago IS on there!

2nd from the bottom...

rodwade said...

I think Joe the plumber would be a formidable candidate. He and Sarah would be unbeatable...

Aurelius said...

Good job RR. Look at all those votes

Reaganite Republican said...

Thanks Aurelius, looks like Sarah's running away with it, nobody else is close... interesting

Like you said- 'poised to strike' at the presidency- I like the sound of that, lol

John Carey said...

I would really like to see a fresh face. I'm not really a fan of any of these pciks; especially Romney! I do like Paul Ryan, but he already stated he would not run. I worry about Sarah running. She has a role to play, just not sure it is as our candidate. I like Perry from Texas.

Reaganite Republican said...

DeMint did surprisingly well John, not a fresh face but...?

I'd vote for him, just wish he had a little more charisma and appeal outside of the South

W.C. Varones said...

Gotta be a fresh face. Romney has RomneyCare and Palin has too much comedy baggage.

I like Chris Christie.

W.C. Varones said...

I love DeMint too, but a social conservative Southerner is not the way to win the country.

whoff said...

Chris Christie has some of the right stuff, but he needs to explain his support for a cap-n-trade scheme. If you don't know about this http://www.nj.com/business/index.ssf/2010/09/post_110.html can begin the tracking.

whoff said...

I could wish for a different poll framework. Who are the contenders is a factual question, even if we're not experts. Who should be, or who do we wish were...contenders, now that's a vote question. IMO

whoff said...

Great site! ...and I wish there were a way to call your attention to something without bogging the blog... but who let the DSCC.org put this ad at the top of the page? "A Right-Wing Senate? Don't Let the Tea Party Extremists Take Over the Senate. Fight Back!"

If we ever did have a "Right-Wing" Senate, it would be the first time and quite a refreshing break from all the "Left-Wing" Senates we've had in the past.

What was Google thinking??

Reaganite Republican said...

I can't control content with these Google ads, Whoff- they decide what goes the channel based on a bot visit only, unfortunately

But sometimes I click on WH and other Dem ads just to see what the other side's up to... I'm sure many of my readers do to, for the same reason as we go and read Kos once in a while

The Lonely Conservative said...

I like DeMint, and I'm in the Northeast! But I'll start thinking about 2012 after we get through 2010.

As for Christie, love where he stands on the unions. I think that's all he's got. He endorses RINOs. He refuses to join the lawsuit against Obamacare, and now I hear via Whoff above that he's all for cap and tax. Didn't he also slam the AZ immigration law?

The Lonely Conservative said...

Oh, and RR, if people click on the libs ads it costs them money. he he!

Good Ole Boy said...

As I was scrolling down the comments I noticed Charles Krauthammer and Karl Rove Conservative Commentary, not my favorite people and acting like elitists. If their not Ivy League they are not fit to serve. O'Donnell may of had a hard time paying her college loans back, but she never drowned a blond guy in her past. I'll bet both of them have far worse in their past.

Anywho as for DeMint I remember the same was said about Clinton. DeMint has been a solid supporter of Tea Party candidates and is a solid conservative. He's on my short list.

Reaganite Republican said...

Yeah LC and Good Ole, this Christie definitely has his week points... endorsed Mike Castle too, and it seems he needs the revenue from cap n trade... NJ's in quite a hole.

I like DeMint, and love what he's doing for conservatives... I dunno if he's got the magic. He sure surprised my in the poll here, not bad

Good Ole Boy said...

Charles Krauthammer is STILL badmouthing O'Donnell as of Sept. 19. He maligned the Tea Party by saying " would you want a Tea Party person in charge of the Senate?" This was on a liberal show chocked full of liberals and Krauthammer was helping them out.He later backed off and defended the Tea Party, must of figured out he did bad.

Reaganite Republican said...

Krauthammer and Rove both in the dog house with conservatives now

Conservative Pup said...

Very interesting poll, James. I am both surprised and pleased to see SP on top right now. I voted my 5 based on who I would like to see run (Palin) and who I feel sure will run (Romney, Paw-paw, DeMint, and I can't remember the other two).

I like Jim DeMint, though he lacks some undefinable quality of "appeal" factor which SP has locked up, for me at least. But I think DeMint is a true conservative and I appreciate that he's been willing to stand apart from his GOP counterparts.

Reaganite Republican said...

Maybe Palin-DeMint?

Palin-Petraeus?

The right VP could make it for her...

Red said...

I like DeMint and Chrisitie but as far as someone who could stir it up Palin is the go-to girl. I like Jindal for what he has been able to accomplish for Louisiana—even though this state has a long way to go and he hasn't gotten everything in line (but still, this is La. A state that has been saturated by democratic policy so the stain will take a while to wash out). I don't know. I'm not completely jazzed by anyone really.And Beck?? BAH! HE shouldn't even be on the list. That guy is a caricature.

Wallace said...

Ron Paul all the way.

He is the only one who speaks the true

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKITUOl0NBc&feature=related

Anonymous said...

LOVE Paul Ryan!! I hope he changes his mind about running. He's young,smarter than b. hussein,has great values and does what he says he'll do.

Post a Comment

The Reaganite Republican welcomes your comments...