05 April 2012

Forces of Justice Finally Closing-in on Cagey, Gambino-esque Obama Regime?


Much as it took an exceptionally brave and driven man like Rudolph Guiliani to cripple NYC's mafia infrastructure in the 1980s, today we have one of the most courageous and principled lawmen in the country -Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio- the only one with the not just the ability, but the cajones to turn-over Obama Administration rocks the MSM has been sitting on for four years...

Of course the same sycophants that have been intentionally hiding the president's dubious past are none-too-keen on Arpaio's efforts to shed some long-overdue light on all this: the 'mainstream' media have basically avoided coverage of the investigation altogether, in what he called 'the biggest censorship blackout in the history of the United States'. 

Trump talked about it/spent money on PIs, and in fairness did push Obama into releasing a long-form birth certificate- yet seemed to lose interest in pressing the issue any further once the desired level of attention was obtained.  The Donald also lacks Sheriff Joe's law-enforcement position and background, and seemed to accept the electronic document at face-value (while Arpaio has found reason to suspect the paper original never even existed) But like many of us have long said, there's plenty of disturbing evidence that Obama is a fraud from-top-to-bottom... all you got to do is look.

Lo-and-behold, further investigation was needed: following a six-month probe, Arpaio now claims that 'probable cause exists indicating that forgery and fraud may have been committed' in the release of that long-form BC.

'America's toughest sheriff' told a TEA Party audience in Arizona this week: 'I wanted to do everything to clear the president of the United States. I wanted to be the guy who stood up here and said that birth certificate is legitimate – leave the president alone. But it didn’t work out that way.'


Baloo

And it does take courage: back in 2008 -shortly after Bill Clinton told a documentary producer hired by Hillary's campaign that 'I know Obama is not qualified' to be president- long-time Clinton friend/party chairman Bill Gwaltney fell victim to murder back in Arkansas. The killer was an unemployed oddball subsequently shot by police himself, so we won't be hearing his version of events anytime soon. 

Slick Willie's not-so-secret plan to 'out Obama' as constitutionally ineligible then suddenly evaporated- and Hillary shocked many by throwing-in-the-towel in exchange for a cabinet position. In order to strike back (how they could), the Clintons are said to have at that point surreptitiously launched the 'birther' movement.

Some of Hillary's 2008 delegates -particularly blacks who refused to switch to Obama at the convention, although under immense pressure to do so- were also killed in mysterious circumstances, i.e. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones

Interesting it is then that Arpaio's probe just this week turned it's focus to interviews with Hillary2008 campaign staff... at the same time that Fox News' new anchor gal suddenly posts (out of the clear-blue sky) "Did the Obama campaign threaten Chelsea Clinton's life?" on Twitter-

Did this leak from Sheriff Joe's "Cold Case Posse"? That would be my guess, as the good Sheriff said just this week he's got 'tons more potentially shocking stuff" on Obama, but has got his hands full with the BC and seemingly-forged Selective Service card for now. 

Also consider how close Obama ally Van Jones blurted-out on TV this week that Obama wouldn't lose the black vote 'even if he came-out as gay'.  Huh? Were did that come from, Freudian slip? And HOW can you even fathom such a possibility... unless you are gay? 

Recall that three openly-gay members of Jeremiah Wright's church were all found dead under mysterious circumstances the very month Obama's ascent to the nomination began and you can see that green-o-commie Jones is really skating on thin ice now... some people just don't know when to shut up.

And you watch your back, Sheriff Joe... I sure wish there was somebody like you out in LA who would take just a bit longer look at the Breitbart case: still hard for some of us to swallow the 'natural causes' conslusion, given what he was doing and how bad things keep happening to any principled individual that dare stand in the way or (ask a few questions of) the brutal and soul-less Obama machine...


AF Branco at CDN

28 comments:

Christopher - Conservative Perspective said...

The only name missing in this post is George Soros,,follow the money.

Anonymous said...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors


No official in Hawaii–—and they are the authorities after all—–has said that there is anything wrong with Obama’s birth certificate or that there is anything different in the published image of it from what they sent to Obama.

Other research done on this issue:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/book-revie…
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/obama-cons…
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/03/decoding-t…
http://www.thefogbow.com/arpaio-report/
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirt…

Woodsterman (Odie) said...

Some say, "No official in Hawaii - and they are the authorities after all - has said that there is anything wrong with Obama's birth certificate...."

That's be cause it didn't originate in Hawaii.

GO SHERIFF JOE!

Anonymous said...

THREE Republican officials in Hawaii have stated in writing that the facts on Obama's birth certificate are accurate and that Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961. This is further confirmed by the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961--which at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii, and the DOH only sent out the birth notices for children who were born in Hawaii.

For those of you who still believe that Obama could have been born in Kenya, or in fact in any foreign country, a question for you:

I’ll bet that you know (but, actually, you may have forgotten) that the US government requires, and has long required, that a child being carried into the USA must have some kind of official travel document to be admitted. This is usually a US passport for the child. Or, it could be the fact that the child is entered on the mother’s US passport. Or, it could be a US visa for the child on a foreign passport. Without one of those, we would not let the child into the country.

So, IF Obama really had been born in Kenya (or in any country other than the USA), he would have had to have one of those documents–wouldn’t he? His family would have had to show the passport, wouldn’t they? To show the passport, they would have had to have applied for the passport or the visa for Obama. And, if Obama really were born in Kenya (or another country), they would have had to have applied for it in the US consulate or embassy there, wouldn’t they?

Such applications are FILED by the US government. The documents exist in multiple files, the actual application itself, communication about it with Washington, entries in the passport file, entries in the application file, entries in the places where the child is carried into the USA. The Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department and the INS for eight years before Obama was elected. Don’t you think that they would have checked the claim that he was born outside the USA?

All they had to do was find one of those files and McCain would win the election.

Well, they never did. There is no such file.

So the question is, do you think that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?

Do you think that the files, the documents, the application for the documents, the communications about the documents were all lost or hidden? Remember, they are in multiple files, the file of the passport holder, the files of applications for passports, the files in the US embassy in foreign countries, the files in the State Department and in the INS (which would have checked in Obama at an entry point if he had actually traveled in 1961)–and yet no document has been found. Why not?

The absence of the travel document, plus the Hawaii birth certificate, plus the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials, plus the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, plus the witness who remembers being told of the birth and writing home about it (to her father, named Stanley, about the unusual event of a birth to a woman named Stanley). All this is evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii. Oh, and by the way, Obama’s Kenyan grandmother NEVER said that Obama was born in Kenya. That was the first of the birther lies. She said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was born in Hawaii. And she said in another interview, with the Hartford Courtant newspaper, that the first that her family had heard of Obama’s birth was IN A LETTER FROM HAWAII.

Reaganite Republican said...

Blah, blah, blah

I'll wait and see what Sheriff Joe has to say before drawing any conclusions, "Anon"- maybe you should take a chill-pill and do the same

Anonymous said...

If you have a brain, you should be able to answer the question.

If Obama were born outside of the USA, how did he get to the USA without a US government record being found? There would have had to have been both INS records and state department records of applications for a passport or a visa--and yet neither has been found.

Was the Bush Administration in on the conspiracy, and did it ignore all the records? Presumably the three Republican officials in Hawaii and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 (which at the time were only sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii) were part of the conspiracy too?

Reaganite Republican said...

OK lol

Anonymous said...

...the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials...

Really? This is your proof? I'm confident, not!

Anonymous said...

Right, first place o'dumbbasterd goes too after winning the election was HI to backtrack his record. His grandmother worked in HI goverment with citizenry records were the false SSN came from, grandparents and mother were communist occupiers to the core...

Reaganite Republican said...

I like the most recent "Anon" better than you other ones, at least he/she/it is making some sense here

But this topic really seems to bring out the trolls... I wonder why that is, paid by Plouffe perhaps?

Anonymous said...

Re: "the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials...

Really? This is your proof? I'm confident, not! "

The confirmation by the three Republicans was in addition to the birth certificate itself, and the birth notices in the newspapers (which were sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in those days) and the fact that there is NO evidence that Obama was born in Kenya or any other country, nor is there a US government document showing that he traveled in 1961.

Re: "Right, first place o'dumbbasterd goes too after winning the election was HI to backtrack his record."

At the time Hawaii was under a Republican governor--who is now running for the US Senate, and a CONSERVATIVE Republican was attorney general of Hawaii. The idea that Obama could get into the records and change them is loony.

More importantly, NONE of the Republican candidates for president has even shown his birth certificate. Obama has shown his birth certificate twice, and the officials have confirmed the facts on it, and they are further confirmed by the birth notices in the newspapers. And, in contrast, the Republicans have not shown their birth certificate at all.

Anonymous said...

The R's AND the D's are in bed with each other and help each other for personal gain and to keep the political class in power. That IS the problem with our monopoly political class. So your arguments have no merit, but the political class loves you because you keep up the old argument of "us versus them." You know, "the rebubs did this and the dems did that and we are right because the R's said so... Please, your arguments are amature at the most...

Anonymous said...

Re: "The R's AND the D's are in bed with each other and help each other for personal gain and to keep the political class in power."

Sure. A Republican governor, who soon would run for the US Senate, would LIE to protect Obama, when if the lie were found out, she would never get a job in the Republican Party again. The same for the other two Republican officials.

And you do not explain the birth notices that were in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in those days, and only for births in Hawaii. And there is the absence of Kenyan (or other country) documents showing that Obama was born there and the absence of US INS or State Department documents showing that he or his mother traveled in 1961.

In addition to the Republican and Democrat officials who confirmed Obama's birth in Hawaii, there is another, the clerk who filled out the form that generated the short-form birth certificate. That is done by copying the facts on the documents in the files.

Six facts that establish that Obama was born in Hawaii:

1. Obama's two official birth certificates—long form and short form---with the state seals on them. (The official physical copy of the long-form birth certificate was handed around in the White House press room, and one reporter said that she had felt the seal and took a photo of the document. http://turningthescale.net​/?p=541)

2. The confirmation of the facts on the two birth certificates--that Obama was born in Hawaii--by THREE Republican officials in Hawaii. And the statement of the current director of health, a Democrat, that she had seen the long-form birth certificate being copied onto security paper, and that that was what she gave to Obama’s lawyer.

3. The notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. (The claim that the notices could have been placed by lying relatives turns out to be false because whenever there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii insisted on a witness statement.)

4. The absence of a US travel document for Obama in 1961. Nor has there been an application for such a travel document found. Nor is there any document in Kenya (or in any other country) showing that Obama’s mother was there in 1961.

5. This witness, who recalls being told of Obama's birth in Hawaii in Kapiolani Hospital in 1961 and writing home about it http://www.buffalonews.com​/incoming/article137495.ec​e (The birther allegation that Dr West had retired by 1961 turns out to be false).

6. Obama's Kenyan grandmother said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was BORN IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview (Hartford Courant) that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

Reaganite Republican said...

What a bunch of horse shit

Where do you get the talking points from, MoveOn or direct from Alexrod et al

Just curious~

Anonymous said...

Where do YOU get your talking points from?

No I am not a member of the White House or any organization. I simply desire to present the facts on birther sites. It amuses me.

And the six points above are the facts. You have not contradicted them. They are the facts, and they show that Obama could not possibly have been born outside of the USA.

Anonymous said...

You guys would be funny if you weren't so scarey! I start to laugh and it sinks in that you believe this shit!

Anonymous said...

Six fantasies that establish that Obama was born in Hawaii:

1. Obama's two official birth certificates—long form and short form---with the state seals on them. (The official physical copy of the long-form birth certificate was handed around in the White House press room, and one reporter said that she had felt the seal and took a photo of the document. http://turningthescale.net​/?p=541)

Proven to be layered and fake

2. The confirmation of the facts on the two birth certificates--that Obama was born in Hawaii--by THREE Republican officials in Hawaii. And the statement of the current director of health, a Democrat, that she had seen the long-form birth certificate being copied onto security paper, and that that was what she gave to Obama’s lawyer.

3 repubs said something to someone while they danced the DC-Two-Step

3. The notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961. (The claim that the notices could have been placed by lying relatives turns out to be false because whenever there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii insisted on a witness statement.)

What, not references? Someone claimed they saw what/where? This is your proof; someone said someone said?

4. The absence of a US travel document for Obama in 1961. Nor has there been an application for such a travel document found. Nor is there any document in Kenya (or in any other country) showing that Obama’s mother was there in 1961.

According to your own reference in 5. below, it brings you th a statement by the posse-teams that says those records of the week o'commie was born are not there and were taken out or destroyed from the microfiche

5. This witness, who recalls being told of Obama's birth in Hawaii in Kapiolani Hospital in 1961 and writing home about it http://www.buffalonews.com​/incoming/article137495.ec​e (The birther allegation that Dr West had retired by 1961 turns out to be false).

Again, someone said, someone said. Also, refer to response above (4).

6. Obama's Kenyan grandmother said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was BORN IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview (Hartford Courant) that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

Ah yeh, There is also a story that she admitted o'kenya was born there in KENYA. Since you have not real references here, I won't give you any on mine.

Again, your arguments are at first thought, amaturish, but I debase them to sophomoric.

Glenn Smith said...

Anonymous -- tell us what country's passport did Obama use to travel to Pakistan? Travel by US Citizens was BANNED during that time period.

Alan B. said...

Ya know,,,Anonymous is right. If a child is born outside of the U.S. And travels into the country, that child travels on his mother's pasport. I know this for a fact. I was born in England--in 1962--to U.S. parents and came into the cont. U.S. in early 1963 on my mothers passport. Now imagine my suprise when I went to renew my Commercial Driver's license and under the new federal guidelines I had to prove my citizenship to get it renewed. I was refused because there was NO PROOF that I had entered the country legally. After several weeks of contention with the Dept. of Transportation and having to bring the USAF and the British Dept. of records into the fight, I got it cleared up. Then I had to go thru the same fight with Homeland Security to get my TWIC (Transportation Workers Identification Card) reissued. I also have had the same problem with the F.B.I. background check when I try to purchase a gun. So Anonymous-- just to do the math for you; that is three (3) Govt. agencies that are supposed to have all of this pertinent information on record that DID NOT. So do not sit there and tell me that it is not possible because I'm telling you that it is.

Reaganite Republican said...

"Ya know,,,Anonymous is right"

Which one lol

Anonymous said...

Re: "Anonymous -- tell us what country's passport did Obama use to travel to Pakistan? Travel by US Citizens was BANNED during that time period. "

Who told you that travel by US citizens was BANNED during that period?

In fact, it was not banned. There was no ban of any kind, either by the USA or by Pakistan. US citizens were welcomed with free 30-day visas on arrival, and there were travel articles in US newspapers recommending visiting "scenic Lahore."

Alan B. said... that it was possible that US government agencies had lost information and hence Obama could really have been born in Kenya or in some other country than the USA.

Answer: Many things are possible, but what are the odds?

In this case the necessity is that TWO different US government agencies, the US State Department and the US Immigration and Naturalization Service lost all the files relevant to a child born overseas being added IN THAT COUNTRY to his mother's US passport AND, at the same time, the US INS lost all the files that show that Obama's mother traveled outside of the USA in 1961 or returned to the USA in 1961 or that Obama entered the USA in 1961.

And, to make it clear, I'm not talking about checking now, when Obama is in power and possibly (but actually unlikely) files can be made to go missing. I am referring to in 2007 and 2008--when the Bush Administration was in power and had access to all the records.

What would you say the odds were of both the State Department and INS files going missing were? Say one in a million?

Add to that the chances of Obama's mother ever making the trip from Hawaii to Kenya (or any other country) when--according to the birther myth--she could have traveled ONLY late in pregnancy. That was very rare in 1961. Very few women traveled late in pregnancy. Airlines often refused to carrying them--and I am referring to the trip from Hawaii to Kenya (or wherever), and there was Yellow Fever in Kenya, and a Yellow Fever shot is bad during pregnancy.

What are the odds of that happening? Say one in a million again>

And, last of all, there are the birth certificates from Hawaii, which we know because of the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers were really issued in 1961.

What are the odds of a family who had had their child born overseas convincing the DOH of a state that the child was actually born in that state? (The birther myth that this was easy in Hawaii, is just that, a myth. When there were claims of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii insisted on witness statements). So what are the odds of that? Say one in a million again?

Re: "Proven to be layered and fake."

No. The answer is that the proof comes from WND's "experts"--who have not proven their expertise and have certainly not shown that they are impartial. There are plenty of experts, some of who are even members of the Tea Party, who say that there was nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate. Layers are, of course, normal in PDF. No official in Hawaii, which is the authority on forged Hawaii official documents, has said that there is anything wrong with Obama's birth certificate.

Maggie@MaggiesNotebook said...

Arpaio has the goods on the newspaper announcement. Anyone could be listed. An adopted 3 year old was announced as a new born. He/she today is legally three years older than he/she thinks. LOL.

Ann Dunham's passport records for the critical time period are missing.

Forgetting all that, the bc he gave after the Donald made such a fuss is not real. It was "created," "manufactured."

The point is, why does he just not release his documents. It's very, very simple.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous, keep that "hope-a-dope" up because your boy is going down! Keep your commie-change!

Anonymous said...

Re: "An adopted 3 year old was announced as a new born."


Perhaps in an ADVERTISEMENT in the paper in another section of the paper. But not in the Health Bureau Statistics listing, which is where Obama's birth announcement appeared. http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/obama-1961-birth-announcement-from-honolulu-advertiser0000.gif

Notice that ALL the birth notices have exactly the same format, name of parents, address (which was in this case Obama's mother's parents address, which is perfectly legal to list), son or daughter, date. All are the same. They are notices, not ads, not listings placed by parents. And the newspapers have said, and the investigation of a PUMA working for Hillary confirms, that the papers took their notices only from the DOH and the DOH did not take claims of births at home from parents without witness statements.

In short, we do not have actual words from the Sheriff's posse that an adoption announcement appeared in the Health Bureau Statistics listing. They claim that it appeared in the newspaper, but they did not show it.

Re: "The point is, why does he just not release his documents. It's very, very simple. "

The answer is that he has already shown the short-form birth certificate and the long-form birth certificate, both the images of them and the physical copies (the long form physical copy was even passed around in the White House Press Room), and THREE Republican (and several Democrats) in Hawaii have confirmed the facts on these documents. These documents, the official physical copies, are the official birth certificates. The original in the file is not an official document.

It is the Republican candidates for president who have not shown their birth certificates.

Once again, what are the odds of Obama having been born in a foreign country? There is no evidence from any country. There is no passport or application to add Obama to a passport, and no INS record of Obama's mother leaving the country or entering the country or Obama entering the country. The percentage of American women who traveled late in pregnancy in 1961 was already one in a million (and to go to Kenya, where there was Yellow Fever, would make the odds even worse), and finally what are the odds that the birth was actually overseas and Obama's parents convinced the officials in Hawaii to grant them a birth certificate that states the was born in Hawaii--and in a hospital.

1) Infinitesimal chances that Obama's mother traveled.
2) Infiniteimal chances that if she traveled there is no record of her leaving the USA, none of her arriving in a foreign country, or giving birth in that country, or leaving that country, or arriving in the USA, or applying for Obama to be on her US passport, and no record of her returning to the USA or Obama arriving in the USA.
3) And, IF, both (1) and (2) occurred, Obama's relatives would still have to convince the officials in Hawaii to issue a birth certificate, which in this case specifically states that he was born in Kapiolani Hospital.

Kapiolani Hospital, by the way, is confirmed not merely by the birth certificate, but by the former governor of Hawaii ( a Republican) and by the witness who wrote home (http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/article137495.ece).

Re: "Anonymous, keep that "hope-a-dope" up because your boy is going down!"

Answer. If you mean that he may lose the election, you may very well be right. But he will not lose because of the laughable fantasy that Obama was born outside the USA or the claims of people who hate him that he forged his birth certificate.

Reaganite Republican said...

Touche', Maggie~

ALLtoJesus said...

Problems with Obama's latest birth certificate:
1. The name of the hospital is incorrect - that name was not used by the hospital until years later.
2. Kenya was not even called Kenya then...not until years later.
http://billcantley.com/pic/?p=413

Anonymous said...

Re: "1. The name of the hospital is incorrect - that name was not used by the hospital until years later."

Answer: Who told you that?

It is wrong. If you go to WND's site and search for the birth certificates of the Nordkye Twins, and look at them, you will discover that they were born in Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital (the same name as on Obama's birth certificate), on day after Obama.

Re: "2. Kenya was not even called Kenya then...not until years later."

Answer. Who told you that? It is wrong too.

It was called "The Kenya Colony"--which it had been called ever since the name was chance from British East Africa in 1920. And the Kenya Colony was in East Africa, and hence the entry of Obama's father that he came from "Kenya, East Africa" is correct.

Reaganite Republican said...

Whatever- for any interested in the truth, the long-form BC presented by the White House last year is indeed fraudulent/counterfeit:

Oblivious to the Obvious

Post a Comment

The Reaganite Republican welcomes your comments...