Hello;I am very impressed by your blog and would love to interview you for my blog: www.sergiopolitics.orgPlease see below questions I would like you to answer:What are your thoughts about the GOP campaign so far?What do you think of Romney vs. Santorum race?How do you think Social Media will play a role in this campaign? and can you compare it to Obama's campaign of 2008?Ron Paul has a great Internet following what do you think other candidates are not doing right or need to do better?What is your opinion of Super PACs and its influence in this GOP race?If you have some other thought you would like to share please feel free.Thank you so much and kind regards;Sergio Veskovicwww.sergiopolitics.org
Could you send an email address, Sergio?TIA
There is only one way to defeat the Drug Cartels. End their price supports. End socialist support for them. End Prohibition. Why? The harder you fight them the more money they make. It is amazing to me that the right - so steeped in market economics - doesn't get this. So why does prohibition work for the cartels? About 90% of their product gets through. How to stop it? A police state. Don't want that? Then try solving a medical problem with some other tool than police.
A new book on 9/11 is out. The author knew the Mossad agent who organised the events of that day.Dimitri Khalezov has spent 10 years researching and writing this book. Download links:http://pastebin.com/EgYe4Ef2Or read at:http://www.scribd.com/doc/170266922/9-11thology-The-third-truth-about-9-11-or-Defending-the-US-Government-which-has-only-the-first-twoIn a 2010 interview, Khalezov explained that you can't build a skyscraper in NYC without an approved demolition plan. On 9/11, the World Trade Center's demolition plan was put into action to demolish the complex.Khalezov learned of this demolition plan from his job in the Soviet Union. He had worked in the nuclear intelligence unit and under an agreement between the Soviet Union and the USA, each country was obliged to inform the other of peaceful uses of nuclear explosions. The WTC was built with 3 thermo-nuclear charges in its foundations.Note: underground nuclear explosions do not produce mushroom clouds. This is only ever seen when the explosion takes place above ground. On 9/11, the explosions were deep underground.More info:http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_154.htmYou can watch the 2010 interview at:http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.htmlVideo # 4 - WTC's demolition planVideo # 14 - WTC 7 (which fell ½ hour AFTER the BBC announced its collapse).Videos # 24/25 - chronic radiation sickness of WTC responders (their cancers are not due to asbestos poisoning)Khalezov was interviewed on 4 Sept 2013:http://www.renseradioarchives.com/harris/Here is a recent article mentioning Khalezov:http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/28/mossad-bush-planned-executed-911/I know it is preposterous to claim that the WTC was brought down by nukes. But note that the place where the WTC once stood is called 'Ground Zero'. If you look up the meaning of 'ground zero' in the old dictionaries you have at home, you'll find that there would only be one definition. It is what you call a place that has been nuked.After 9/11, the US government sent people out to switch all the dictionaries in the public domain. The replacements differed only in the meaning of 'ground zero'. They show extra definitions for that term, to obfuscate the original single meaning.For example, if you have a genuine old Merriam-Webster dictionary, you would see this:ground zero n (1946) : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs.The replacement books (even of old editions) show two extra definitions and this is what you'll see:ground zero n (1946) 1 : the point directly above, below, or at which a nuclear explosion occurs. 2: the center or origin of rapid, intense, or violent activity or change 3: the very beginning : SQUARE ONEHave a look at this video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBQuoPi_grwAt 6:05 mins, he shows the old and new definitions of 'ground zero'.
The Reaganite Republican welcomes your comments...