28 April 2011

Seven Real Reasons to Think Obama Long Form Birth Certificate is a Forgery

While not appearing to be a group particularly aligned with my end of the political spectrum -judging by the tone of the article- Smoking Gun has nonetheless posted some interesting observations on the Obama birth certificate released in Pdf form yesterday afternoon...

• If the original document was in a bound volume (as reflected by the curvature of the left hand side of the certificate), how can the green patterned background of the document's safety paper be so seamless?
• Why, if Obama was born on August 4, 1961, was the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” four days later on August 8, 1961?
• What is the significance of the smudges in the box containing the name of the reported attendant?
• David A. Sinclair, the M.D. who purportedly signed the document, died nearly eight years ago at age 81. So he is conveniently unavailable to answer questions about Obama’s reported birth.
• In the “This Birth” box there are two mysterious Xs above “Twin” and “Triplet.” Is there a sibling or two unaccounted for?
• What is the significance of the mysterious numbers, seen vertically, on the document’s right side?
• Finally, the “Signature of Local Registrar” in box 21 may be a desperate attempt at establishing the document’s Hawaiian authenticity.  Note to forgers: It is spelled “Ukulele.”

Er, make that eight -here-
Is Obama Birth Certificate a Forgery xxx Is Obama Birth Certificate a Forgery xxx Is Obama Birth Certificate a Forgery


Randy-g said...

Everything about Barry from his birth to now is a sham.

Anonymous said...

I can answer #1. The original certificate was not on safety paper. The paper used to copy the original is the green patterned paper.

Proof said...

Number 1, I agree with anonymous. The green paper was probably just the stock the copy was printed on (to help prevent further alterations).
Number 2, the Nordyke twins, whose certificates the Honolulu Advertiser reproduced, were born on the 5th and registered on the 11th.

The delay is not as troublesome to me as the fact that according to Obama's certificate, he was born one day before the twins, was registered three days before the twins , yet his file number is three numbers higher than theirs. Generally, public records tend to be sequential.


Woodsterman (Odie) said...

He's really Soros' illegitimate son.

Anonymous said...


Thanks for the great article and you make excellent points.

Obama's just released long form birth certificate is quite fishy and probably a forgery. He has released a copy of a certified copy and no outsider has seen the original. It seems that Hawaii's Democratic Governor and Obama's friend Abercombie made or caused to be made a backdated birth certificate fabricated (forged) and then they have issued a certified copy of the forgery. Here is why:

1. If Obama had a US birth certificate, why did he not release it before?
2. He has a birth certificate from Kenya, posted online. How could he be born in 2 places?
3. His name is wrong on the US birth certificate and says it is Barack Obama II. He has never referred to himself and the media has never referred to him as Barack Obama II.
4. His mother's last name is listed as Obama suggesting she was married to the African Obama. But the African Obama was already married and since bigamy is illegal, he could not have married Ann.
5. The signatures look fishy too.
6. A Hawaii official swore several months ago (wnd.com) that Obama's birth certificate does not exist. So this must be a backdated forgery.

Unless some independent document examiners go and examine the original for signs of forgery, this copy he has released should be presumed to be a forgery. Obama did that because he was worried that he might lose the reelection over this issue, so they decided to make a birth certificate up.

Anonymous said...

Proof - The number on Prez-BO's birth certificate is 10641. The Nordyke twins number on their birth certificates are 10637 and 10638. Explain how the number on Prez-BO's birth certificate is a higher number when he was born a day earlier than the Nordyke twins? It should be a lower number!

Anonymous said...

When you open it with illustrator it has 9 layers, my 15 year old could do a better job than whomever put it together.
Keep looking at this a don't look at what he is doing....

Anonymous said...

the same handwriting wrote the dates on both his and the nordyke twins bc's where the mothers signed and dated the documents. they never write the date in for you. you date a document when you sign it!

Mark Adams said...

RR, they missed some stuff here. :)

The R in Barack is faint, just like the “Date Accepted by Local Reg.” And like the 'non' of "none" in box 17a
Look closely to box 7e, the 'X' in the yes box is blurred.
Box 16 upper part of the K in Kansas missing. Bad uppercase key? Then way is it not prevalent on the other uppercase K's on the doc.
Just saying. LOL

Political Cartoons said...

Why Obama continues to be so deceptive is beyond me. This would be a very easy issue to nip in the bud if he wanted to. Yet he is the one responsible for giving continued life to this story. What is it that you are hiding Mr. Obama?

Andrew33 said...

The problem with this issue is that by the time it gains enough traction to get BHO out of office, we can get him voted out. However, there are quite a few clueless folks who believe BHO was born here. They are unhappy with the economy but don't think about politics much. Those people are "swing voters" and like it or not, they see the birther movement as extreme. Has anyone considered that BHO may be using this as a "wedge" to drive independents away from the tea party?

Anonymous said...

Give it up wackos. A black man is president and will be for 6 more years. Let your worst nightmare begin.

FelixAndAva said...

I honestly couldn't care less whether the President is green with orange polka dots, unlike those leftists who think such accidents of birth are all that matters.

Unlike liberals, what matters to me is competence and character, both of which are sadly deficient in the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Matt said...

AHHHHHHH!!! I really hoped that this would go away.

Mark Adams said...

"A black man is president and will be for 6 more years"
HE'S BLACK??? I hadn't noticed. Thanks for being a racist and pointing that out.... cause I could careless.

Bungalow Bill said...

This all seems like a set up, including Trumps bit of theater.

Reaganite Republican said...

--AHHHHHHH!!! I really hoped that this would go away.--

Not me, the traffic's great lol

Anonymous said...


Maggie@MaggiesNotebook said...

One mistake is that all of us calling for his Certification of Live Birth (he still only produced the Certificate of Live Birth - although it is longer than the previous) should have insisted that Congress see it and validate it.

Everyone is backing off of this like it's a case of the measels or worse. Now the big effort to accept it, no matter what we've seen about what happens in Illustrator.

No one in Hawaii is verifying that they entered the "vault" and provided the copy. No one ever talks about Obama, but plenty know plenty.

I don't know it's real or not, but there are still many questions. BTW, wouldn't you think the good doctor Sinclair might have told his wife that he delivered the good Senator from Illinois?

Always On Watch said...

You know what's driving me crazy about this birther thing? The fact that no matter is Obama is ineligible to serve as POTUS, Congress will do nothing. We all know that he will not voluntarily step down.

Reaganite Republican said...

EXACTLY Maggie and AoW-

The whole thing stinks like trash truck juice

A_Nonny_Mouse said...

Re point #2: I understand 8/4/61 was a Friday. Paperwork for births (which continue through the weekend even though the clerical staff works Monday-Friday) would get stacked in the in-basket of the clerk who processes it. Then Saturday's papers would be stacked on top of that, and Sunday's work would be on top of that. Monday morning, the processing clerk would start at the top of the stack of paper and work his way down. If the stack happened to be huge, he might not get to the bottom of his in-basket until Tuesday (8/8/61).

I'm no supporter of Obama, and I can't address the rest of the "questionable items" posted above, but I'd say that items #1 (image of a book-bound document photocopied onto tamper-proof security paper) and #2 (working downward thru stacked documents) are not proofs of forgery. IMHO.

Post a Comment

The Reaganite Republican welcomes your comments...